[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”4px||5px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”0px|||||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-221128.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 221128″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”411px” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”0px||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]

Money laundering is a complex and pervasive issue that plagues the global financial system. It involves concealing the origins of illegally obtained funds, making them appear to be from legitimate sources.

In this blog series, we will delve deep into the law of money laundering, focusing on Attachment, Adjudication, and Confiscation of Property as per the Money Laundering Act 2002 (PMLA).

The PMLA serves as the primary anti-money laundering (AML) law in many countries and provides a robust framework to combat this financial crime. Understanding these legal concepts and their implications is essential for individuals, businesses, and financial institutions to stay compliant and avoid severe penalties.

As we progress through the series, we aim to provide an engaging and informative overview of the adjudication process and the money laundering law as a whole, shedding light on the various aspects that contribute to the global fight against money laundering.

Section 5: Attachment of Property Involved in Money Laundering

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”485px” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-221159.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 221159″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”-28px|auto||auto||” custom_padding=”||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]

Section 5 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) 2002 is a crucial part of the anti-money laundering act, as it deals with the attachment of property involved in money laundering.

The purpose of this section is to ensure that any proceeds of crime are secured and made available for confiscation if necessary. This serves as a vital tool in the adjudication process and helps in the enforcement of the money laundering law.

The provisional attachment of property can be ordered by a Director or any officer authorized by the Director, not below the rank of Deputy Director, based on the material in their possession.

This is an essential safeguard to prevent the abuse of power and ensure that due process is followed.

There are two provisos to Section 5(1) of the PMLA, which ensure that the attachment of property is done in a fair and just manner. The first proviso outlines the conditions that must be met before a provisional attachment order can be issued.

This includes forwarding a report to a Magistrate under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973, filing a complaint by an authorized person, or making a similar report or complaint under the corresponding law of another country.

The second proviso allows for the attachment of property in cases where there is an urgent need to secure the proceeds of crime, provided that certain conditions are met. 

This provision ensures that the money laundering act 2002 is effective in tackling money laundering even in situations where immediate action is required to prevent the proceeds of crime from being concealed, transferred, or dealt with in a manner that could frustrate any proceedings related to confiscation.

By striking a balance between the rights of individuals and the need to combat money laundering, Section 5 of the PMLA plays a crucial role in the overall adjudication process.

Constitutional Validity of Section 5(1)

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”||5px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-221324.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 221324″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”527px” custom_margin=”||2px|||” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]

Section 5(1) of the PMLA has been upheld as constitutionally valid by the courts, as it provides a balance between the interests of the person involved and the need to secure the proceeds of crime.

This provision plays a crucial role in the enforcement of the anti money laundering act, ensuring that those involved in money laundering activities cannot evade justice.

The section includes several safeguards to protect the rights of individuals involved:

• The requirement for the authorized officer to form an opinion and record the reasons for their belief in writing, based on the material in their possession.This prevents arbitrary and baseless decisions, ensuring that the attachment and confiscation of property is based on solid evidence.
• The provisional attachment order must be based on the officer’s satisfaction that the person is in possession of the proceeds of crime. This ensures that the attachment is necessary to prevent the frustration of any proceedings under the money laundering act 2002.
• The attachment and adjudication process is designed to prevent any abuse of power. With fixed durations in place, the provisional attachment order must not exceed 180 days from the date of the order. This time limit ensures that the attachment does not become a permanent seizure without due process.

To further maintain a fair adjudication process, Section 5(1) of the PMLA includes the following provisions:

 

• The first proviso ensures that the provisional attachment order is not made unless a report has been forwarded to a Magistrate or a complaint has been filed before a Magistrate or court, in relation to the scheduled offense.

 

• The second proviso requires the authorized officer to record their satisfaction and reasons for belief in writing, based on the material in their possession, that the property involved in money laundering, if not attached immediately, would frustrate proceedings under the PMLA.

These safeguards and provisions serve to uphold the constitutional validity of Section 5(1) of the PMLA, ensuring that the attachment, adjudication, and confiscation of property in relation to money laundering activities are carried out in a fair and just manner.

By striking a balance between individual rights and the need to secure the proceeds of crime, this section plays a vital role in the effective enforcement of the money laundering law.

Role of the Authorized Officer in Provisional Attachment

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”||4px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-221356.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 221356″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”522px” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”17px||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]

The authorized officer plays a crucial role in the process of provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) 2002.

This officer is entrusted with the responsibility of ensuring that the proceeds of crime are secured and dealt with according to the provisions of the PMLA.

In this section, we will delve deeper into the responsibilities and actions of the authorized officer during the provisional attachment process.

1. Formation of an opinion and recording reasons:

Before issuing a provisional attachment order, the authorized officer must form an opinion and record the reasons for their belief in writing, based on the material in their possession.

This requirement ensures that the attachment order is not based on mere assumptions but on solid evidence. Some factors the officer might consider while forming an opinion include:

• The nature and source of the property in question
• The involvement of the property in any criminal activity
• The relationship between the property and the person suspected of money laundering

2. Acting with urgency:

The officer must act quickly to secure the proceeds of crime to prevent any frustration of the proceedings under the PMLA.

This urgency is essential because any delay in securing the proceeds of crime might result in their concealment, transfer, or dealing in a manner that could undermine the ongoing investigation or the eventual confiscation process.

3. Coordination with jurisdictional police:

If the scheduled offense has not yet been registered by the jurisdictional police, the authorized officer can proceed under Section 5 while simultaneously sending information to the police for registering the offense.

This coordination ensures that the police are informed of the suspected money laundering activity and can take appropriate action to investigate and prosecute the offenders.

4. Adherence to safeguards:

 

The PMLA provides several safeguards to ensure fairness in the provisional attachment process. The authorized officer must adhere to these safeguards, which include:

• Obtaining necessary approvals from higher-ranking officials
• Following the prescribed procedure for provisional attachment
• Ensuring that the provisional attachment order does not exceed the specified duration of 180 days

5. Accountability and reporting:

The authorized officer is accountable for their actions during the provisional attachment process.They must report to the Adjudicating Authority and submit a complaint within 30 days of the attachment.

This reporting ensures that the officer’s actions are scrutinized and evaluated by an independent authority, promoting transparency and fairness in the process.However, the authorized officer plays a pivotal role in the provisional attachment process under the PMLA.

Their actions help secure the proceeds of crime and ensure that these funds do not evade the reach of the law. By adhering to the legal requirements and safeguards, the officer contributes to the fight against money laundering and the preservation of the integrity of the financial system.

Initiating Action Under the 2002 Act

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”566px” custom_padding=”||7px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-221515.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 221515″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”521px” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”645px” custom_padding=”0px||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”683px” global_colors_info=”{}”]

There is a significant distinction between initiating prosecution for a scheduled offense and initiating provisional attachment under Section 5 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) 2002.

Registration of the scheduled offense is a prerequisite for prosecution; however, it is not required for provisional attachment. This distinction serves an essential purpose within the Act.

The machinery provisions of the PMLA are designed to prevent the frustration of proceedings under the Act. By allowing provisional attachment without a pre-registered criminal case, the Act ensures that the proceeds of crime are secured and available for confiscation.

This effectively prevents and regulates money laundering offenses, which is the primary objective of the anti-money laundering law.

To further clarify, consider the following key points:

The PMLA focuses on securing the proceeds of crime and preventing money laundering, which may require swift action in certain cases.

The adjudication process under the PMLA ensures that provisional attachment can take place without waiting for the registration of the scheduled offense, allowing authorities to act more quickly.

The provisional attachment serves as a preventive measure that can be initiated even without a pre-registered criminal case, allowing authorities to secure assets before they are concealed, transferred, or dealt with in a manner that could frustrate proceedings under the Act.

In conclusion, understanding the distinction between initiating prosecution for a scheduled offense and initiating provisional attachment under Section 5 of the PMLA is crucial for comprehending the Act’s broader goals.

The Act’s machinery provisions are designed to ensure that the proceeds of crime are secured, ultimately preventing and regulating money laundering offenses while maintaining a fair and accountable adjudication process.

Attachment and Confiscation of Property Under Possession of Other Persons

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-221633.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 221633″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”439px” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”0px|||||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]

Section 5(1) of the PMLA encompasses a broader scope, which includes properties in the possession of other persons, not just the accused in the scheduled offense.

This ensures that all parties involved in the process or activity connected with the proceeds of crime are held accountable under the money laundering law.

If a person is found to be engaged in any process or activity associated with the proceeds of crime, they may face the repercussions of a provisional attachment order.

In such cases, they could be named as an accused in the complaint filed by the authorized officer concerning the offense under Section 3 of the PMLA. This further strengthens the adjudication process and the effectiveness of the anti money laundering act.

The attachment and confiscation of property under the possession of other persons highlight the comprehensive nature of the money laundering act 2002.

It emphasizes the importance of ensuring that no party involved in money laundering activities can evade the legal consequences by merely transferring the proceeds of crime to another person.

By incorporating such provisions, the PMLA successfully deters individuals from engaging in money laundering activities and promotes a transparent financial system. This ultimately contributes to the overarching goal of combating money laundering and safeguarding the integrity of the nation’s financial institutions.

Adjudicating Authority and Fairness in Provisional Attachment

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”0px|||||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-221741.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 221741″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”495px” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”0px|||||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]

The Adjudicating Authority, established under the PMLA, plays a crucial role in upholding fairness and accountability throughout the provisional attachment process.

This three-member body, appointed as per Section 6(1) of the PMLA, ensures that the process remains transparent and efficient.

To maintain a transparent system, the Director or other authorized officer must forward a copy of the provisional attachment order to the Adjudicating Authority in a sealed envelope, as per Section 5(2).

The Adjudicating Authority is then responsible for retaining the order for a prescribed period, which is instrumental in keeping the process accountable.

Some key aspects of the Adjudicating Authority’s role include:

• Evaluating the provisional attachment orders forwarded by authorized officers
• Ensuring that proper procedures have been followed during the attachment process
• Assessing the validity and fairness of the provisional attachment

The provisional attachment order ceases to operate on the date of an order passed by the Adjudicating 

Authority under Section 8(3) or the expiry of the period specified in sub-section (1), whichever is earlier. This provision helps to prevent any unnecessary or extended periods of attachment, safeguarding the interests of those involved.

Additionally, the authorized officer is obliged to file a complaint before the Adjudicating Authority within 30 days from the provisional attachment. This requirement ensures a timely resolution of the matter and further strengthens the overall fairness of the process under the PMLA.

Nevertheless, the Adjudicating Authority is an essential component of the provisional attachment process under the PMLA, providing transparency, fairness, and accountability in the proceedings related to money laundering and anti-money laundering laws.

Conclusion

The law of money laundering, specifically Attachment, Adjudication, and Confiscation of Property, is a complex area that requires careful consideration by individuals and businesses.

By understanding the provisions of Section 5 of the PMLA and the safeguards in place, one can better navigate the legal landscape and stay compliant. 

This blog series has shed light on the intricacies of the law and its implications for those involved in financial activities.We have delved into the constitutional validity, interconnectivity of transactions, and the attachment and confiscation of property under the possession of other persons. 

The information provided should serve as a useful starting point for anyone seeking to understand the ins and outs of the money laundering act 2002, the adjudication process, and anti money laundering law.

As regulations continue to evolve, it is crucial for businesses and individuals alike to stay up-to-date on the latest developments in money laundering law to ensure compliance and protect their interests.

FAQ:

Q: What is the primary purpose of Section 5 of the PMLA (Prevention of Money Laundering Act)?

A: The primary purpose of Section 5 of the PMLA is to provide a framework for the provisional attachment, adjudication, and confiscation of property that is suspected to be involved in money laundering.

This is done to prevent the concealment, transfer, or dealing of such proceeds of crime in a manner that may frustrate legal proceedings.

Q: What are the safeguards in place under Section 5 of the PMLA?

A: Section 5 of the PMLA includes several safeguards, such as requiring the authorized officer to have a reasonable belief based on material in their possession, recording their belief in writing, and following specific procedures for provisional attachment.

 Additionally, the attachment order has a fixed duration and is subject to review by the Adjudicating Authority.

Q: What is the role of the Adjudicating Authority in the PMLA?

A: The Adjudicating Authority is responsible for determining whether the property provisionally attached under Section 5 of the PMLA is indeed involved in money laundering.

It also ensures fairness and accountability in the attachment process and can order the release of the property if it finds no basis for the attachment.

Q: What is the significance of the constitutional validity of Section 5(1) of the PMLA?

A: The constitutional validity of Section 5(1) ensures that the provision adheres to the principles of the Constitution and does not infringe upon the fundamental rights of individuals. It confirms that the section is legally sound and can be enforced without violating the rights of the parties involved.

Q: Can the property of a person not directly involved in money laundering be attached under Section 5 of the PMLA?

A: Yes, Section 5 of the PMLA allows for the attachment of property held by any person if the property is believed to be proceeds of crime, even if the person is not directly involved in the money laundering offense.

This is because the section aims to prevent and regulate money laundering and ensure the availability of the proceeds of crime for appropriate legal action.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”-12px|auto||auto||” custom_padding=”18px|485px||||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_divider _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_divider][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row column_structure=”1_4,3_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”314.3px” custom_margin=”-34px|auto|-5px|auto||” custom_padding=”25px||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”1_4″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/A-guide-to-the-law-of-Money-Laundering.jpg” title_text=”A guide to the law of Money Laundering” _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” border_radii=”on|3px|3px|3px|3px” border_width_all=”4px” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”52px|||||” global_colors_info=”{}”]

If you found this article helpful, you may be interested in Advocate Vijay Pal Dalmia, along with Advocate Siddharth Dalmia‘s book, “A Guide to the Law of Money Laundering”. This comprehensive guide provides even more in-depth information on how to recognize and prevent money laundering. It’s packed with practical tips and advice for staying one step ahead of financial criminals. Get your copy today at here.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”-12px|auto||auto||” custom_padding=”18px|485px||||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_divider _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_divider][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row column_structure=”1_4,3_4″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”-29px|auto||auto||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”1_4″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_team_member name=”Vijay Pal Dalmia” position=”Advocate” image_url=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/OIP.jpg” _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”||0px|||” border_radii_image=”on|4px|4px|4px|4px” border_color_all_image=”#000000″ box_shadow_style_image=”preset1″ global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_team_member][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]

By

Vijay Pal Dalmia, Advocate

Supreme Court of India & Delhi High Court

Email id: vpdalmia@gmail.com

Mobile No.: +91 9810081079

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_social_media_follow _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” width=”100%” min_height=”49px” custom_margin=”-17px|||2px||” custom_padding=”0px|||0px||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_social_media_follow_network social_network=”facebook” url=”https://www.facebook.com/vpdalmia” _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” background_color=”#3b5998″ global_colors_info=”{}” follow_button=”off” url_new_window=”on”]facebook[/et_pb_social_media_follow_network][et_pb_social_media_follow_network social_network=”twitter” url=”http://www.twitter.com/vpdalmia” _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” background_color=”#00aced” global_colors_info=”{}” follow_button=”off” url_new_window=”on”]twitter[/et_pb_social_media_follow_network][et_pb_social_media_follow_network social_network=”linkedin” url=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/vpdalmia/” _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” background_color=”#007bb6″ global_colors_info=”{}” follow_button=”off” url_new_window=”on”]linkedin[/et_pb_social_media_follow_network][/et_pb_social_media_follow][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”0px|47px|0px|45px||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_divider _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”||13px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_divider][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”55.8px” custom_padding=”0px||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”51.8px” custom_margin=”||-16px|||” custom_padding=”||86px|||” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]

Related Articles

 

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row column_structure=”1_5,3_5,1_5″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” background_image=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-010035.png” background_repeat=”repeat” background_blend=”darken” min_height=”96.3px” custom_margin=”-54px|auto||auto||” custom_padding=”30px||27px|||” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_column type=”1_5″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_button button_url=”https://jurisnode.com/?p=982&et_fb=1&PageSpeed=off” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Prev” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”22px” button_text_color=”#FFFFFF” button_bg_color=”#000000″ button_border_color=”#FFFFFF” button_border_radius=”100px” button_letter_spacing=”0px” button_font=”|700|||||||” button_icon=”@||divi||400″ button_icon_placement=”left” custom_margin=”40px|36px||36px|false|false” animation_style=”fold” hover_enabled=”0″ box_shadow_style=”preset7″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content” sticky_enabled=”0″][/et_pb_button][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”3_5″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” text_font=”|700|||||||” text_text_color=”#FFFFFF” header_text_color=”#FFFFFF” width=”100%” min_height=”79.6px” custom_margin=”5px||||false|false” custom_padding=”0px|0px|8px|18px||” filter_hue_rotate=”3deg” filter_brightness=”200%” animation_style=”fold” text_text_shadow_style=”preset5″ text_text_shadow_color=”#000000″ header_text_shadow_style=”preset2″ header_text_shadow_color=”#000000″ border_color_all=”#000000″ border_style_all=”outset” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]

This will shed light on the intricacies of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 and its implications for combating money laundering offences in India.

Be sure to check back regularly for new insights and updates on this complex and ever-evolving area of law.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_5″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_button button_url=”https://jurisnode.com/?p=1056&et_fb=1&PageSpeed=off” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Next” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”22px” button_text_color=”#FFFFFF” button_bg_color=”#000000″ button_border_color=”#FFFFFF” button_border_radius=”100px” button_letter_spacing=”0px” button_font=”|700|||||||” button_icon=”A||divi||400″ custom_margin=”43px|36px||-14px|false|false” animation_style=”fold” hover_enabled=”0″ box_shadow_style=”preset7″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content” sticky_enabled=”0″][/et_pb_button][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]