Online Gaming and Betting – India Responds-The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025

Online Gaming and Betting – India Responds-The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025

The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025 (hereinafter “the Act”), passed by the Parliament of India in August 2025, represents the most significant and disruptive legislative intervention in the nation’s digital economy to date. The legislation introduces a bifurcated policy framework: on one hand, it seeks to actively promote and regulate nascent sectors

Online Gaming and Betting – India Responds-The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025 Read More »

Oral Family Settlements & The Registration Requirement In Property Disputes

Oral Family Settlements & the Registration Requirement In Property Disputes

Family property disputes are among the most common and emotionally charged issues in India. These conflicts typically arise when joint family properties are passed down or during partitions, often leading to disagreements over ownership, possession, and distribution. The lack of clear terms regarding property division exacerbates these disputes, particularly when family members have differing recollections

Oral Family Settlements & the Registration Requirement In Property Disputes Read More »

Call Recordings: Evidentiary Value Vs. Privacy Violation

Call Recordings: Evidentiary Value Vs. Privacy Violation

One-Party Consent Call Recordings and the Privacy Paradox Phone call recordings have grown its popularity in this new digital era, serving as both a tool for personal security and a means of gathering evidence in judicial procedures. One of the most important legal challenges involving phone recordings is the concept of one-party consent, which allows

Call Recordings: Evidentiary Value Vs. Privacy Violation Read More »

Why the Supreme Court Has Barred Electronic Service of Section 41‑A / Section 35 Notices and What the BNSS Means for Police Practice

WhatsApp Isn’t a Warrant: Why the Supreme Court Has Barred Electronic Service of Section 41‑A CrPC Notice / Section 35 Notice and What the BNSS Means for Police Practice

Police stations across India have, for years, tried to save time by pinging suspects on WhatsApp with a Section 41‑A CrPC notice instead of delivering it by hand. The practice looked efficient—delivery ticks, timestamps, even blue ticks as proof of reading. But on 21 January 2025, a two‑judge Bench in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI drew a red line: “Service of notice

WhatsApp Isn’t a Warrant: Why the Supreme Court Has Barred Electronic Service of Section 41‑A CrPC Notice / Section 35 Notice and What the BNSS Means for Police Practice Read More »

SC’s order in Satender Kumar Antil case mandates strict bail reform, Aadhaar-linked bonds & bans WhatsApp notices under S. 41-A CrPC/BNSS

Supreme Court Tightens Bail‑Reform Compliance (Satender Kumar Antil Judgment)

— January 2025 Orders in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI — Ever since the Supreme Court’s landmark judgment in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2022) 10 SCC 51, the Court has treated arbitrary arrests and prolonged under‑trial detention as a structural problem that corrodes the criminal‑justice system. The latest directions issued on 21 January 2025 push State Governments, Union Territories and High Courts to convert

Supreme Court Tightens Bail‑Reform Compliance (Satender Kumar Antil Judgment) Read More »

Doctrine of Foreign Equivalents under (Indian) Trade Marks Law

Doctrine of Foreign Equivalents under (Indian) Trade Marks Law

The foreign equivalents doctrine is a rule in U.S. trademark law that requires courts and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to translate foreign words when evaluating their suitability for trademark registration or possible confusion with existing registered marks. This translation is crucial for assessing the registrability of a trademark. The principle seeks to

Doctrine of Foreign Equivalents under (Indian) Trade Marks Law Read More »

Notice to Accused & Witnesses by Police in India

Notice to Accused & Witnesses by Police in India

Supreme Court Reinforces Safeguards for Arrest Procedures and Undertrial Rights In a significant development in the ongoing case of Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI & Anr. (Miscellaneous Application No. 2034/2022 in MA 1849/2021 in SLP(Crl) No. 5191/2021 ), the Supreme Court of India has issued critical directives aimed at strengthening procedural safeguards for undertrial prisoners

Notice to Accused & Witnesses by Police in India Read More »

The Law Relating To SFIO (Serious Fraud Investigation Office) (Flow chart)

The Law Relating To SFIO (Serious Fraud Investigation Office)

Statutory Provisions Provision About the SFIO Key take-aways Section 211 Companies Act 2013 Constitutes the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) as a multidisciplinary agency under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. SFIO is a statutory body; no separate Act exists. CA2013 Sec. 212 Central Govt. may assign an investigation to SFIO; confers search-and-seizure, summons and arrest

The Law Relating To SFIO (Serious Fraud Investigation Office) Read More »

Scroll to Top