Plea Bargaining under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act: An In-Depth Analysis (FREE!!)

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”0px||5px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-204206.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 204206″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”379px” custom_margin=”-16px|||||” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”0px||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]

Plea bargaining, a widely used legal mechanism, allows an accused person to negotiate with the prosecution in order to receive a lesser punishment in exchange for a guilty plea.

For individuals facing charges related to money laundering, it is essential to comprehend the concept of plea bargaining under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). This act, also known as the Money Laundering Act 2002, was enacted to combat the money laundering offence and confiscate the proceeds of crime.

In this article, we provide an in-depth analysis of plea bargaining under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 (PMLA), examining its restrictions, implications, and the legal framework governing this process.

We also delve into a case study to offer a practical understanding of how plea bargaining is applied in PMLA cases. By exploring these aspects, we aim to equip you with valuable insights into the complex world of plea bargaining under the PMLA Act.

Plea Bargaining in the Indian Legal System

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”485px” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-204304.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 204304″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”436px” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”-28px|auto||auto||” custom_padding=”||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]

Plea bargaining refers to a legal procedure where the accused and prosecution agree to a negotiated resolution, typically resulting in a reduced sentence or lesser charges in exchange for a guilty plea.

Introduced in the Indian legal system through the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005, plea bargaining is governed by Section 265A to 265L of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

Plea bargaining aims to reduce the burden on courts by expediting the disposal of cases and providing an opportunity for accused individuals to avoid lengthy trials and harsher punishments.

However, not all cases are eligible for plea bargaining, as certain restrictions apply to protect the interests of justice and public safety.

Restrictions on Plea Bargaining

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”||5px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-204411.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 204411″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”519px” custom_margin=”||2px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]

Section 265A of the CrPC outlines the types of cases that are not eligible for plea bargaining. These restrictions are in place to ensure that individuals accused of severe crimes or those with grave consequences for society are not allowed to take advantage of the plea bargaining process.

There are two primary categories of cases where plea bargaining is not permissible:

Offences that the government has notified as affecting the ‘socio-economic’ condition of the country:

The Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), for instance, is a legislation aimed at combating money laundering and confiscating the proceeds of crime.

Offences under the PMLA are considered to affect the socio-economic condition of the country and thus, are ineligible for plea bargaining.

Offences where the punishment prescribed by law is:

Death;
Life imprisonment; or
Imprisonment for a term in excess of seven years: This restriction is put in place to ensure that serious offences, such as murder or rape, are not allowed to be resolved through plea bargaining.

This is to maintain the integrity of the judicial process and ensure that justice is served.

It is important to understand these restrictions to avoid any misconceptions or false expectations when considering plea bargaining as a potential course of action.

The Indian legal system is designed to strike a balance between the need for efficient case disposal and the protection of public interest, making these restrictions a crucial component of the plea bargaining process.

In summary, plea bargaining is not available for:

Offences under the PMLA, as they impact the socio-economic condition of the country
Serious crimes with severe punishments, such as death, life imprisonment, or imprisonment for a term exceeding seven years

Understanding these restrictions can help individuals facing criminal charges make informed decisions about their legal options and ensure that the plea bargaining process is used appropriately and effectively.

Plea Bargaining and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”||4px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-190215.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 190215″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”436px” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”17px||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]

The Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), also known as the Money Laundering Act 2002, was enacted to combat money laundering offences and confiscate property derived from unlawful activities.

The PMLA Act is designed to strengthen the legal framework against financial crimes, safeguard the economy, and maintain financial stability.

Offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 are considered to affect the socio-economic condition of the country, making them ineligible for plea bargaining under Section 265A of the CrPC.

This ineligibility highlights the seriousness of money laundering offences and the need for strict enforcement of PMLA provisions.

The Enforcement Directorate (ED), an agency responsible for enforcing the Prevention of Money Laundering Act PMLA, plays a crucial role in deciding whether to accept or reject a plea bargaining application.

The ED’s primary focus is to investigate and prosecute individuals involved in money laundering activities, which involve the handling and conversion of proceeds of crime.

Since money laundering offences have a significant impact on the country’s economy and financial stability, the ED is often stringent in its approach towards plea bargaining in PMLA cases.

This strict approach serves to deter potential offenders and ensure that those involved in money laundering are held accountable for their actions.

As a result, accused individuals facing charges under Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 cannot resort to plea bargaining if the offence committed affects the socio-economic conditions of the country.

This restriction further emphasizes the gravity of money laundering offences and the importance of the PMLA in addressing financial crimes.

In summary, plea bargaining is not available for money laundering offences under the PMLA due to the following reasons:

Money laundering offences are considered to affect the socio-economic condition of the country.
The ED, responsible for enforcing the PMLA, takes a stringent approach towards plea bargaining in PMLA cases.
The restriction on plea bargaining ensures that individuals involved in money laundering are held accountable and face appropriate legal consequences.

The Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 aims to protect the nation’s economy and financial stability by imposing strict regulations and penalties on those involved in money laundering activities.

Consequently, the unavailability of plea bargaining in such cases serves to uphold the objectives of the PMLA and ensure the effective prosecution of money laundering offences.

Case Study: Vijay Mallya and Plea Bargaining

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”430px” custom_padding=”||7px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-204534.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 204534″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”379px” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”0px||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”7px|||||” global_colors_info=”{}”]

Vijay Mallya, a high-profile Indian businessman, faced charges under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) for alleged financial irregularities and loan defaults, which led to a substantial amount of proceeds of crime.

In this case, Mallya requested a plea bargain to resolve the legal proceedings against him and mitigate the consequences of the money laundering offence.

However, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) refused his plea bargaining request, arguing that accepting it would:

Open the floodgates for various other financial offenders
Compromise the objectives of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002
Undermine the efforts to curb money laundering and recover the proceeds of crime

The agency emphasized the severe consequences of money laundering on the country’s economy and the need for strict enforcement of PMLA provisions, highlighting that the PMLA Act aims to target those who contribute to the financing of illegal activities.

This case illustrates the challenges faced by individuals accused of money laundering offences when seeking plea bargaining opportunities under PMLA.

It demonstrates the strict approach adopted by the authorities in upholding the integrity of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act PMLA and ensuring that the perpetrators of such crimes do not escape the appropriate legal consequences.

Impact of Plea Bargaining Restrictions on PMLA Cases

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”||6px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-204631.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 204631″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”523px” custom_padding=”||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”2px||1px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]

The restrictions on plea bargaining in PMLA cases present several challenges for accused individuals, as they are often left with limited options to resolve their cases.

Some of these challenges include:

Lengthier legal proceedings: Accused persons facing charges under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) may experience longer trials, as they cannot resort to plea bargaining for a quicker resolution.
Increased legal costs: The inability to opt for plea bargaining may result in higher legal expenses for the accused, as they need to prepare for full-fledged trials and potentially engage in lengthy appeals processes.
Stricter punishments: Accused individuals are at a higher risk of facing severe penalties if they are found guilty in cases related to money laundering offences under PMLA. The absence of plea bargaining means they cannot negotiate for reduced sentences.

However, these restrictions also serve as a deterrent for potential offenders, ensuring that individuals engaging in money laundering activities cannot evade stringent legal consequences by resorting to plea bargaining.

This ultimately upholds the objectives of the PMLA, protecting the socio-economic interests of the country and combating money laundering effectively.

The benefits of plea bargaining restrictions in PMLA cases include:

Upholding the rule of law: The restrictions emphasize the seriousness of money laundering offences and demonstrate the commitment of the legal system to hold offenders accountable.
Maintaining public confidence: By ensuring that those accused of money laundering under the PMLA Act face appropriate legal consequences, the restrictions help to maintain public confidence in the judicial system and its ability to address financial crimes effectively.
Protecting the economy: Money laundering has far-reaching consequences on a country’s economy, as it can distort financial markets, facilitate corruption, and undermine legitimate businesses.

The plea bargaining restrictions under PMLA play a crucial role in safeguarding the nation’s economic interests by discouraging money laundering activities.

While the restrictions on plea bargaining in PMLA cases pose challenges for accused individuals, they also serve a greater purpose by reinforcing the importance of combating money laundering offences and preserving the country’s socio-economic well-being.

Conclusion

Understanding the limitations of plea bargaining under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) is essential for individuals facing charges related to money laundering offences.

While plea bargaining can expedite case resolution and offer leniency in certain criminal cases, it is not available for offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002, which significantly impact the country’s socio-economic condition.

The case of Vijay Mallya highlights the challenges faced by accused individuals when seeking plea bargaining opportunities in cases involving the PMLA Act.

By imposing restrictions on plea bargaining for money laundering cases, the legal system ensures that offenders face appropriate consequences and that the integrity of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act PMLA is maintained in the pursuit of justice.

It is crucial for anyone dealing with proceeds of crime and the Money Laundering Act 2002 to be aware of these limitations, as they play a critical role in shaping the legal landscape and influencing the outcomes of cases related to money laundering.

This knowledge can help individuals better navigate the complex legal processes and make more informed decisions when confronted with PMLA charges.

FAQ:

Q: What is plea bargaining and how does it relate to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)?

A: Plea bargaining is a legal process in which an accused person negotiates with the prosecution to receive a lesser punishment in exchange for a guilty plea. Under the PMLA, plea bargaining is generally not available to those accused of money laundering offences, as they are considered to affect the socio-economic condition of the country.

Q: Are all money laundering offences ineligible for plea bargaining under the PMLA?

A: Yes, money laundering offences under the PMLA are considered to affect the socio-economic condition of the country, which makes them ineligible for plea bargaining as per Section 265A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

Q: What role does the Enforcement Directorate (ED) play in plea bargaining requests related to money laundering offences under the PMLA?

A: The ED, an agency responsible for enforcing PMLA, plays a crucial role in deciding whether to accept or reject a plea bargaining application in cases related to money laundering offences. The ED ensures that the objectives of the PMLA are upheld, and individuals involved in money laundering do not evade stringent legal consequences through plea bargaining.

Q: Why was Vijay Mallya’s plea bargaining request refused by the ED?

A: Vijay Mallya’s plea bargaining request was refused by the ED because they believed that accepting it would open the floodgates for various other financial offenders, compromise the objectives of the PMLA, and undermine the efforts to curb money laundering and recover the proceeds of crime.

Q: What does the Vijay Mallya case reveal about plea bargaining opportunities for individuals accused of money laundering offences under the PMLA?

A: The Vijay Mallya case highlights the challenges faced by individuals accused of money laundering offences when seeking plea bargaining opportunities under the PMLA. It demonstrates the strict approach adopted by the authorities in upholding the integrity of the PMLA and ensuring that the perpetrators of such crimes do not escape the appropriate legal consequences.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”-12px|auto||auto||” custom_padding=”37px|485px||||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_divider _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_divider][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row column_structure=”1_4,3_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”314.3px” custom_margin=”-34px|auto|-5px|auto||” custom_padding=”25px||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”1_4″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/A-guide-to-the-law-of-Money-Laundering.jpg” title_text=”A guide to the law of Money Laundering” _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” border_radii=”on|3px|3px|3px|3px” border_width_all=”4px” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”52px|||||” global_colors_info=”{}”]

If you found this article helpful, you may be interested in Advocate Vijay Pal Dalmia, along with Advocate Siddharth Dalmia‘s book, “A Guide to the Law of Money Laundering”. This comprehensive guide provides even more in-depth information on how to recognize and prevent money laundering. It’s packed with practical tips and advice for staying one step ahead of financial criminals. Get your copy today at here.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”-12px|auto||auto||” custom_padding=”0px|485px|2px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_divider _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_divider][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row column_structure=”1_4,3_4″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”-29px|auto||auto||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”1_4″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_team_member name=”Vijay Pal Dalmia” position=”Advocate” image_url=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/OIP.jpg” _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”||0px|||” border_radii_image=”on|4px|4px|4px|4px” border_color_all_image=”#000000″ box_shadow_style_image=”preset1″ global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_team_member][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]

By

Vijay Pal Dalmia, Advocate

Supreme Court of India & Delhi High Court

Email id: vpdalmia@gmail.com

Mobile No.: +91 9810081079

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_social_media_follow _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” width=”100%” min_height=”49px” custom_margin=”-17px|||2px||” custom_padding=”0px|||0px||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_social_media_follow_network social_network=”facebook” url=”https://www.facebook.com/vpdalmia” _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” background_color=”#3b5998″ global_colors_info=”{}” follow_button=”off” url_new_window=”on”]facebook[/et_pb_social_media_follow_network][et_pb_social_media_follow_network social_network=”twitter” url=”http://www.twitter.com/vpdalmia” _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” background_color=”#00aced” global_colors_info=”{}” follow_button=”off” url_new_window=”on”]twitter[/et_pb_social_media_follow_network][et_pb_social_media_follow_network social_network=”linkedin” url=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/vpdalmia/” _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” background_color=”#007bb6″ global_colors_info=”{}” follow_button=”off” url_new_window=”on”]linkedin[/et_pb_social_media_follow_network][/et_pb_social_media_follow][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”0px|47px|0px|45px||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_divider _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”||13px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_divider][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”55.8px” custom_padding=”0px||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”51.8px” custom_margin=”||94px|||” custom_padding=”||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”]

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row column_structure=”1_5,3_5,1_5″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” background_image=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-010035.png” background_repeat=”repeat” background_blend=”darken” min_height=”96.3px” custom_margin=”-54px|auto||auto||” custom_padding=”30px||27px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”1_5″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_button button_url=”https://jurisnode.com/?p=946&et_fb=1&PageSpeed=off” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Prev” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”22px” button_text_color=”#FFFFFF” button_bg_color=”#000000″ button_border_color=”#FFFFFF” button_border_radius=”100px” button_letter_spacing=”0px” button_font=”|700|||||||” button_icon=”@||divi||400″ button_icon_placement=”left” custom_margin=”40px|36px||36px|false|false” animation_style=”fold” box_shadow_style=”preset7″ global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_button][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”3_5″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” text_font=”|700|||||||” text_text_color=”#FFFFFF” header_text_color=”#FFFFFF” width=”100%” min_height=”79.6px” custom_margin=”5px||||false|false” custom_padding=”0px|0px|8px|18px||” filter_hue_rotate=”3deg” filter_brightness=”200%” animation_style=”fold” text_text_shadow_style=”preset5″ text_text_shadow_color=”#000000″ header_text_shadow_style=”preset2″ header_text_shadow_color=”#000000″ border_color_all=”#000000″ border_style_all=”outset” global_colors_info=”{}”]

This will shed light on the intricacies of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 and its implications for combating money laundering offences in India.

Be sure to check back regularly for new insights and updates on this complex and ever-evolving area of law.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_5″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_button button_url=”https://jurisnode.com/?p=967&et_fb=1&PageSpeed=off” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Next” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”22px” button_text_color=”#FFFFFF” button_bg_color=”#000000″ button_border_color=”#FFFFFF” button_border_radius=”100px” button_letter_spacing=”0px” button_font=”|700|||||||” button_icon=”A||divi||400″ custom_margin=”43px|36px||-14px|false|false” animation_style=”fold” box_shadow_style=”preset7″ global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_button][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]