Money laundering has been a significant problem across the globe, and India is no exception. To tackle this issue, the Indian government enacted the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in 2002, which came into effect on July 1, 2005. The act aims to prevent and control money laundering, which involves concealing or disguising the proceeds of crime, acquiring or using such proceeds, or presenting them as clean property.
This post will discuss the various aspects of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) 2002, including its history, definition, and key provisions.
A brief history of the Origin of the Crime
Money laundering is not a new phenomenon and has existed since ancient times. However, it gained prominence in the 20th century with the rise of organised crime in the West. Criminals used various means, such as owning laundromats or other legitimate businesses, to mix their illicit earnings with legitimate income to make their stash appear legal.
In India, the Hawala system has been a popular method of money laundering, where intermediaries transfer funds between countries without physically moving money. This system has been in existence since the 8th century and has been used to transfer large sums of money across borders.
Understanding the definition of Money Laundering
The Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) 2002 defines money laundering as an act of directly or indirectly attempting to indulge or knowingly assisting or knowingly being a party or actually involved in concealing, possessing, acquiring, using, projecting as untainted property, or claiming as untainted property, in any manner whatsoever, the proceeds of crime.
The definition also states that the process or activity connected with the proceeds of crime is a continuing activity and continues until a person is directly or indirectly enjoying the proceeds of crime by concealing, possessing, acquiring, using, projecting it as untainted property, or claiming it as untainted property in any manner whatsoever.
Understanding the Key Provisions of the PMLA 2002
The Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) 2002 has several key provisions aimed at preventing and controlling money laundering. Some of the essential provisions are discussed below:
- Reporting obligations: The PMLA 2002 imposes reporting obligations on various entities, including banks, financial institutions, and intermediaries. These entities must maintain transaction records, report suspicious transactions to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), and follow the KYC (Know Your Customer) norms.
- Punishment for money laundering: The PMLA 2002 provides for rigorous imprisonment for a term ranging from three years to seven years and a fine for committing the offence of money laundering. The punishment can be increased to ten years if the proceeds of crime involved are more than one crore rupees.
- Attachment and confiscation of property: The PMLA 2002 allows for attachment and confiscation of property involved in money laundering. The attachment can be made at any stage of the investigation, and the confiscated property can be sold by the government.
- International cooperation: The PMLA 2002 provides for international cooperation in the investigation and prosecution of money laundering offences. The government can enter into agreements with other countries for mutual legal assistance and exchange of information.
Challenges in Implementing the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002
The implementation of the PMLA 2002 has faced several challenges, including:
- Lack of resources: The enforcement agencies lack the necessary resources to effectively investigate and prosecute money laundering offences. The PMLA requires coordination among various agencies, including the police, customs, and tax departments, which can lead to delays and inefficiencies in the investigation process.
- Complex legal framework: The legal framework for investigating and prosecuting money laundering offences is complex, and the authorities must navigate multiple laws and regulations. This complexity can lead to confusion and delays in the investigation and prosecution of money laundering offences.
- Low conviction rate: The conviction rate for money laundering offences in India is low. Several factors contribute to this, such as the accused persons’ ability to hire expensive lawyers, delays in the legal process, and lack of evidence.
- Burden of proof: The burden of proof in money laundering cases lies with the prosecution, which can be challenging to prove beyond reasonable doubt.
- Political interference: In some cases, political interference has hindered the investigation and prosecution of money laundering offences. This interference can come in the form of pressure on investigators or prosecutors to drop cases or delay the legal process.
To effectively combat money laundering in India, entities covered by the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) 2002 must comply with reporting obligations and cooperate with enforcement agencies. The act has been instrumental in detecting and prosecuting money laundering offences, despite its challenges.
By
Vijay Pal Dalmia, Advocate
Supreme Court of India & Delhi High Court
Email id: vpdalmia@gmail.com
Mobile No.: +91 9810081079
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vpdalmia/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/vpdalmia
Twitter: @vpdalmia
