[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”0px||5px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-225633.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 225633″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”416px” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”0px||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]
Money laundering is a multifaceted crime frequently involving numerous inter-connected transactions. Grasping the nuances of these transactions is essential for the prosecution and defense in money laundering cases.
In this insightful article, we will explore the concept of inter-connected transactions, the significance of Section 24 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), the adjudication and confiscation processes under Section 8, and their legal implications.
By demystifying the intricate inter-connectivity of transactions, we can better comprehend the inner workings of money laundering investigations and trials, ultimately contributing to a more effective legal approach.
Understanding Inter-Connected Transactions in Money Laundering
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”485px” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-183752.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 183752″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″ min_height=”421px” custom_padding=”|||34px||”][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”-28px|auto||auto||” custom_padding=”||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]
Inter-connected transactions in money laundering refer to a series of financial activities that are linked and designed to conceal the origin of illicit funds.
These transactions often involve various financial institutions, accounts, and individuals, creating layers of complexity that make it challenging for authorities to trace the source of the funds under the framework of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
Money launderers typically employ three stages to conceal the proceeds of crime: placement, layering, and integration. Placement involves introducing the illicit funds into the financial system, such as depositing cash into bank accounts or purchasing assets.
Layering consists of conducting multiple transactions to distance the funds from their criminal origin, often through a series of complex transactions, including wire transfers and asset sales.
Finally, integration is the process of reintroducing the laundered funds back into the legitimate economy, such as through investment in legal businesses or real estate.
In money laundering cases, it is essential for investigators to establish the inter-connectivity of transactions to prove that they form part of a larger money laundering scheme.
This can be achieved through the examination of financial records, tracking the flow of funds, and identifying patterns of suspicious activity. Establishing inter-connectivity can be challenging due to the complex nature of money laundering schemes, the use of shell companies, and the involvement of multiple jurisdictions.
Moreover, the anti-money laundering act requires financial institutions to implement robust measures to detect and report suspicious transactions to the authorities. These measures include Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures, transaction monitoring, and reporting of suspicious activity to the relevant government agencies.
In conclusion, understanding the inter-connected transactions in money laundering is crucial for authorities to successfully investigate, prosecute, and ultimately dismantle money laundering schemes.
By unraveling the intricate web of transactions, law enforcement agencies can effectively combat this pervasive financial crime and recover the proceeds of crime.
Section 24: Presumption in Inter-Connected Transactions
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”||5px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-230855.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 230855″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”450px” custom_margin=”||2px|||” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” alt=”Best Practices for Government to Combat Money Laundering Worldwide” sticky_enabled=”0″][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]
Section 24 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) is a pivotal provision that aims to streamline the prosecution process in cases of money laundering.
By creating a legal presumption, it significantly impacts the burden of proof dynamics between the prosecution and the accused.
Legal Presumption under Section 24
Under Section 24 of the PMLA, if a person is charged with a money laundering offense, the law presumes that the proceeds of crime are involved in the money laundering activity unless the accused can establish otherwise.
This presumption has several implications, including:
- Shifting the burden of proof from the prosecution to the defense
- Requiring the accused to provide evidence to refute the presumption
- Ensuring that the prosecution does not have to establish inter-connected transactions beyond a reasonable doubt
The Accused’s Responsibility to Disprove the Presumption
To challenge this presumption, the accused must produce evidence that demonstrates the transactions in question are not connected to money laundering.
Some ways to disprove the presumption include:
- Providing documentation to prove the legitimacy of the transactions
- Establishing that the transactions were unrelated to the proceeds of crime
- Demonstrating that the funds involved were from a legal source
Rationale behind Section 24
The primary rationale behind Section 24 is to facilitate the prosecution of money laundering cases by reducing the burden on authorities to prove the inter-connectivity of transactions.
By assuming the transactions are connected to money laundering, the prosecution can focus on other aspects of the case, such as establishing the underlying criminal activity and tracing the proceeds of crime.
Concerns regarding the Rights of the Accused
Despite the benefits of Section 24 in prosecuting money laundering cases, the provision raises concerns about the rights of the accused.
Shifting the burden of proof from the prosecution to the defense could potentially undermine the principle of “innocent until proven guilty.”
Critics argue that this shift may lead to an imbalance in the justice system, as the accused may face difficulties in proving their innocence, particularly in complex financial cases involving multiple transactions.
In conclusion, Section 24 of the PMLA plays a significant role in establishing the connection between transactions and money laundering.
While it facilitates the prosecution process, it raises concerns about the rights of the accused. Navigating these legal complexities requires a thorough understanding of the PMLA and the principles of the justice system.
Adjudication and Confiscation under Section 8 of the PMLA
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”||4px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-225826.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 225826″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”522px” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”17px||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]
Section 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) is a crucial component of the legal framework dealing with money laundering cases.
It outlines the adjudication and confiscation process for properties involved in inter-connected transactions associated with money laundering. This process serves as a deterrent and ensures that criminals do not profit from their illicit activities.
In order to determine if a transaction is connected to money laundering and thus subject to adjudication and confiscation, it must meet specific criteria.
Some of these factors include:
- The nature of the transaction
- The parties involved in the transaction
- The value of the property in question
- Evidence suggesting a connection to proceeds of crime
The adjudication and confiscation process can be intricate and time-consuming, often involving multiple legal proceedings.
These proceedings may include:
- Hearings before the adjudicating authority: The authority examines the evidence presented by both the prosecution and defense to determine if the property should be confiscated.
- Appeals to higher courts: If either party disagrees with the decision of the adjudicating authority, they can appeal to higher courts for further consideration.
During these legal proceedings, the prosecution and defense will present their arguments and evidence to either establish or refute the connection between the transactions and money laundering.
It is crucial for both sides to provide compelling evidence, as the outcome of the adjudication and confiscation process hinges on the strength of their respective cases.
Overall, Section 8 of the PMLA plays a vital role in the fight against money laundering by providing a legal mechanism for the confiscation of properties involved in illicit transactions.
By understanding the adjudication and confiscation process, we can better appreciate the challenges and complexities faced by legal professionals in money laundering cases.
The Role of Inter-Connected Transactions in Money Laundering Investigations
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”496px” custom_padding=”||7px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-230135.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 230135″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”468px” custom_margin=”-16px|||||” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”0px||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]
Inter-connected transactions serve as crucial evidence in money laundering investigations. By establishing the links between various transactions, investigators can demonstrate that they form part of a larger money laundering scheme.
This evidence can then be used to prosecute those involved in the criminal activity and confiscate the proceeds of crime under the anti-money laundering act. When dealing with money laundering cases, law enforcement agencies must consider the PMLA (Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002) and its provisions.
The act provides a legal framework for the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of money laundering offenses, making it a valuable tool in the fight against financial crimes.
Establishing the inter-connectivity of transactions can be a challenging task for investigators. They must navigate the complexities of financial transactions, analyze large volumes of data, and potentially cooperate with multiple jurisdictions to trace the flow of funds.
The use of advanced technology, such as data analytics and artificial intelligence, can aid in identifying patterns and connections between transactions.
In order to successfully uncover inter-connected transactions, investigators often rely on a combination of financial intelligence, analytical tools, and cooperation with other agencies.
Financial intelligence units (FIUs) play a vital role in collecting, analyzing, and disseminating information on suspicious financial activities. They provide valuable insights that can help investigators identify patterns and trends associated with money laundering.
Furthermore, collaboration with foreign counterparts and international organizations can prove instrumental in tracking down transactions that span across multiple jurisdictions. Sharing information and resources can significantly enhance the effectiveness of money laundering investigations.
Another important aspect of investigating inter-connected transactions is understanding the adjudication process under the PMLA. Adjudication authorities play a crucial role in determining whether the property involved in the transactions is to be confiscated as proceeds of crime.
By following the legal framework set out by the act, investigators can ensure that their findings have a strong foundation in court proceedings.
In conclusion, the role of inter-connected transactions in money laundering investigations is of paramount importance. Identifying and proving the links between these transactions allows law enforcement agencies to build a strong case against those involved in money laundering activities.
To achieve this, investigators must employ a combination of financial intelligence, analytical tools, international cooperation, and a thorough understanding of the adjudication process under the PMLA.
With these resources at their disposal, investigators are better equipped to unravel the intricate web of inter-connected transactions and bring the perpetrators to justice.
Legal Implications and Strategies for Defense
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”||6px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-230355.png” title_text=”Screenshot 2023-05-18 230355″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”478px” custom_padding=”||0px|||” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″ width=”97.5%”][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”2px||1px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”||27px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”]
Inter-connected transactions have significant legal implications for both prosecution and defense in money laundering cases under the PMLA. For the prosecution, proving the inter-connectivity of transactions is essential for establishing a money laundering offense.
This involves demonstrating how these transactions form part of a larger scheme designed to conceal the proceeds of crime.
On the other hand, the defense must navigate the challenges presented by the anti-money laundering act to refute the charges. Challenging the presumption of inter-connected transactions can be a key strategy in doing so.
To build a strong defense, attorneys can employ various strategies:
- Presenting evidence of legitimate sources of funds: By providing documentation that supports the legitimacy of the transactions in question, the defense can counter the prosecution’s allegations of money laundering.
- Demonstrating that transactions were unrelated to criminal activity: The defense can argue that the transactions were conducted for legal purposes and were not intended to conceal the proceeds of crime. This can involve presenting alternative explanations for the transactions and showing that they were unrelated to any criminal activity.
- Questioning the reliability of the prosecution’s evidence: The defense can challenge the quality and credibility of the evidence presented by the prosecution. This may involve pointing out inconsistencies or weaknesses in the case, such as errors in the investigation process, the use of unreliable witnesses, or the misinterpretation of financial records.
In conclusion, understanding the legal implications of inter-connected transactions is crucial for both prosecution and defense in money laundering cases. By employing effective strategies, defense attorneys can challenge the presumption of inter-connected transactions and potentially refute the charges, ultimately protecting the rights of their clients.
Conclusion
Understanding the inter-connectivity of transactions is crucial for navigating the complexities of money laundering cases. By examining the roles of Section 24 and Section 8 of the PMLA, we can gain insight into the legal framework surrounding inter-connected transactions and their implications for both prosecution and defense.
As we continue to combat money laundering and its devastating effects on society, it is vital to unravel the intricate web of inter-connected transactions to ensure that justice is served and the proceeds of crime are confiscated.
FAQ:
Q: What are inter-connected transactions in the context of money laundering?
A: Inter-connected transactions in money laundering refer to a series of linked financial activities designed to conceal the origin of illicit funds. Money launderers often use multiple transactions involving various financial institutions, accounts, and individuals to create layers of complexity that make it difficult for authorities to trace the source of the funds.
Q: How does Section 24 of the PMLA facilitate the prosecution of money laundering cases?
A: Section 24 of the PMLA establishes a presumption that proceeds of crime are involved in money laundering if a person is charged with the offense.
This presumption places the burden of proof on the accused to demonstrate that the transactions in question are not connected to money laundering. The rationale behind Section 24 is to reduce the burden on the authorities to prove the inter-connectivity of transactions in money laundering cases.
Q: What is the role of adjudication and confiscation under Section 8 of the PMLA?
A: Section 8 of the PMLA deals with the adjudication and confiscation of property involved in inter-connected transactions associated with money laundering.
When a transaction is determined to be connected to money laundering, the property involved may be subject to adjudication and eventual confiscation by the authorities. This process helps ensure that the proceeds of crime are seized and taken out of the hands of criminals.
Q: Why is it important to understand the inter-connectivity of transactions in money laundering cases?
A: Understanding the inter-connectivity of transactions is crucial for investigating and prosecuting money laundering cases. By establishing the links between various transactions, investigators can demonstrate that they form part of a larger money laundering scheme.
This evidence can then be used to prosecute those involved in the criminal activity and confiscate the proceeds of crime.
Q: What strategies can defense attorneys employ to challenge the presumption of inter-connected transactions in money laundering cases?
A: Defense attorneys can challenge the presumption of inter-connected transactions by presenting evidence of legitimate sources of funds, demonstrating that transactions were unrelated to criminal activity, or questioning the reliability of the prosecution’s evidence.
By challenging the presumption, defense attorneys can create doubt about the connection between the transactions and money laundering, potentially leading to a favorable outcome for the accused.
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”-12px|auto||auto||” custom_padding=”18px|485px||||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_divider _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_divider][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row column_structure=”1_4,3_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”314.3px” custom_margin=”-34px|auto|-5px|auto||” custom_padding=”25px||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”1_4″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_image src=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/A-guide-to-the-law-of-Money-Laundering.jpg” title_text=”A guide to the law of Money Laundering” _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” border_radii=”on|3px|3px|3px|3px” border_width_all=”4px” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”52px|||||” global_colors_info=”{}”]
If you found this article helpful, you may be interested in Advocate Vijay Pal Dalmia, along with Advocate Siddharth Dalmia‘s book, “A Guide to the Law of Money Laundering”. This comprehensive guide provides even more in-depth information on how to recognize and prevent money laundering. It’s packed with practical tips and advice for staying one step ahead of financial criminals. Get your copy today at here.
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”-12px|auto||auto||” custom_padding=”18px|485px||||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_divider _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_divider][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row column_structure=”1_4,3_4″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”-29px|auto||auto||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”1_4″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_team_member name=”Vijay Pal Dalmia” position=”Advocate” image_url=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/OIP.jpg” _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”||0px|||” border_radii_image=”on|4px|4px|4px|4px” border_color_all_image=”#000000″ box_shadow_style_image=”preset1″ global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_team_member][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]
By
Vijay Pal Dalmia, Advocate
Supreme Court of India & Delhi High Court
Email id: vpdalmia@gmail.com
Mobile No.: +91 9810081079
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_social_media_follow _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” width=”100%” min_height=”49px” custom_margin=”-17px|||2px||” custom_padding=”0px|||0px||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_social_media_follow_network social_network=”facebook” url=”https://www.facebook.com/vpdalmia” _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” background_color=”#3b5998″ global_colors_info=”{}” follow_button=”off” url_new_window=”on”]facebook[/et_pb_social_media_follow_network][et_pb_social_media_follow_network social_network=”twitter” url=”http://www.twitter.com/vpdalmia” _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” background_color=”#00aced” global_colors_info=”{}” follow_button=”off” url_new_window=”on”]twitter[/et_pb_social_media_follow_network][et_pb_social_media_follow_network social_network=”linkedin” url=”https://www.linkedin.com/in/vpdalmia/” _builder_version=”4.20.4″ _module_preset=”default” background_color=”#007bb6″ global_colors_info=”{}” follow_button=”off” url_new_window=”on”]linkedin[/et_pb_social_media_follow_network][/et_pb_social_media_follow][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”0px|47px|0px|45px||” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_divider _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”||13px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_divider][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”55.8px” custom_padding=”0px||0px|||” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” min_height=”51.8px” custom_margin=”||-16px|||” custom_padding=”||94px|||” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]
Related Articles
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row column_structure=”1_5,3_5,1_5″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” background_image=”https://jurisnode.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-18-010035.png” background_repeat=”repeat” background_blend=”darken” min_height=”96.3px” custom_margin=”-54px|auto||auto||” custom_padding=”30px||27px|||” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_column type=”1_5″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_button button_url=”https://jurisnode.com/the-constitutional-validity-of-section-51-free/” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Prev” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”22px” button_text_color=”#FFFFFF” button_bg_color=”#000000″ button_border_color=”#FFFFFF” button_border_radius=”100px” button_letter_spacing=”0px” button_font=”|700|||||||” button_icon=”@||divi||400″ button_icon_placement=”left” custom_margin=”40px|36px||36px|false|false” animation_style=”fold” hover_enabled=”0″ box_shadow_style=”preset7″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content” sticky_enabled=”0″][/et_pb_button][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”3_5″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” text_font=”|700|||||||” text_text_color=”#FFFFFF” header_text_color=”#FFFFFF” width=”100%” min_height=”79.6px” custom_margin=”5px||||false|false” custom_padding=”0px|0px|8px|18px||” filter_hue_rotate=”3deg” filter_brightness=”200%” animation_style=”fold” text_text_shadow_style=”preset5″ text_text_shadow_color=”#000000″ header_text_shadow_style=”preset2″ header_text_shadow_color=”#000000″ border_color_all=”#000000″ border_style_all=”outset” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]
This will shed light on the intricacies of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 and its implications for combating money laundering offences in India.
Be sure to check back regularly for new insights and updates on this complex and ever-evolving area of law.
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_5″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_button button_url=”https://jurisnode.com/?p=1088&et_fb=1&PageSpeed=off” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Next” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”22px” button_text_color=”#FFFFFF” button_bg_color=”#000000″ button_border_color=”#FFFFFF” button_border_radius=”100px” button_letter_spacing=”0px” button_font=”|700|||||||” button_icon=”A||divi||400″ custom_margin=”43px|36px||-14px|false|false” animation_style=”fold” hover_enabled=”0″ box_shadow_style=”preset7″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content” sticky_enabled=”0″][/et_pb_button][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
